wikinews030.

please note our disclaimer page – we have nothing in common with the Wikimedia Foundation

Update in eigener Sache – wofür gibt die Wikimedia Foundation Spendengelder aus?

with 6 comments

[wn030]

.

Es gibt ein Update in eigener Sache – wir müssen uns darauf vorbereiten, in nächster Zukunft eventuell überraschende Post von der Wikimedia Foundation zu erhalten. Hinweise und Links zu weiteren Informationen finden Sie hier – wir bemühen uns, unser Backup schneller online zu haben als die Wikimedia Foundation ihre Briefe auf unserem Schreibtisch.  Der Direktlink zu der überraschenden Diskussion auf einer Seite, die der Wikimedia Foundation gehört, ist hier.

.

We have an update regarding our page – we have to be prepared to get surprising letters from the Wikimedia Foundation. The link to a talk on a page belonging to the Wikimedia Foundation that we recently received a hint at, is here. We were initially not sure how fast we’ll manage to have the full backup online, just in case, but the backup was fortunately up the very same day we were notified about this talk. You will find our backup page here. Click and bookmark that link if you want to stay tuned – just in case.

To be honest – we find it absolutely interesting that the Wikimedia Foundation seems to have enough donation money to spend on lawyers fighting against non-commercial wordpress pages, but in case you are a visitor who found us via a link on a page belonging to this Foundation: “Trademark infringement occurs when the use of a trademark in connection with the sale of goods or services is likely to result in consumer confusion as to the source, affiliation, sponsorship or approval of those goods or services. However, if a party uses another’s trademark in a way that does not deceive the public, there can be no trademark infringement because a trademark owner has the right to prohibit only uses of its mark that are likely to result in consumer confusion.” (source) – Now it could be interesting to hear how on earth the personnel discussing here got the idea that our page or any content on it could be confused with their registered trademark. This is a wordpress page. Our contents are of mainly journalistic nature. With the exception of some press review pages, these contents are on basis of original research on the ground, meaning on basis of contributors who attend events themselves in order to report about them. Aside of those, our pages contain occasionally feuilleton style articles plus some literary work, marked as such. Both – work on basis of our own original research as well as literary contents are absolutely contrary to the nature of contents on pages related with the Wikimedia Foundation, where original research is not acceptable (quotes and linking to the quoted source are needed for verification), not to mention literary contents. The sentence  “in connection with the sale of goods or services” is especially interesting since we are not selling goods or services on this page.

Looking forward to the communication exchange.

Update: we read on the discussion page that what the Wikimedia Foundation might be missing is a disclaimer. No problem at all. Here is the disclaimer.

.

.

Update: “maximale Aufregung” – die sind gut.

.

.

Written by wn030

December 18, 2012 at 10:59 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. wn030-5

    December 21, 2012 at 12:39 am

  2. wn030-2

    December 21, 2012 at 8:56 pm

  3. wn030-2

    December 21, 2012 at 8:57 pm

  4. …und was machen wir nun bei dem? Berliner Zeitung 1.9.2009 – Die haben, im Gegensatz zu den anderen, kein Kommentarfeld, in dem man eine Umleitungswarnung anschalten könnte.
    .
    (Auch wenn die Berliner Zeitung manchmal etwas in Verruf kommt – dass sie gelegentlich UFOs im Netz sieht, also gelegentlich Seiten besucht, die gar nicht existieren, sollte sie sich nicht auch noch nachsagen lassen müssen…)

    wn030-2

    December 21, 2012 at 11:08 pm

  5. If you ever donated money to the Wikimedia Foundation, DO WATCH THEM NOW.

    We have a link to another possible target of them – we have found it recently online. The twitter account on the right side is the owner of this paper.li – news outlet.

    Do watch them, if you ever donated money to the Wikimedia Foundation – watch what they spend it for. If it’s for expensive legal fights about peanut topics, instead of doing something productive with the money, you should donate your kröten more careful.

    teeater

    December 24, 2012 at 1:05 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s